Digital image representing Informatica data quality.

Angsuman Dutta

CTO, FirstEigen

Data Integrity Issues in Banking: Major Compliance Challenges and Solutions

Table of Contents
    Add a header to begin generating the table of contents
    Table of Content

      Overview of Data Integrity Challenges in Banking

      Banks face a high cost when data errors slip through due to inadequate data control. Examples include fines for TD Bank, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup due to failures in anti-money laundering controls and data management. The main reasons for these data issues include non-scalable data processes, unrealistic expectations of subject matter experts (SMEs), difficulty reconciling data across platforms, resistance to modern solutions, and the inability to detect broken data pipelines. To address these problems, banks should adopt a “fingerprinting” approach, which continuously monitors data patterns and trends, providing a safety net like a seatbelt. DataBuck, an AI assistant to autonomously monitor data quality, offers features such as automated rule recommendations, continuous trust monitoring, secure architecture, and scalability. By adopting these modern solutions, banks can reduce regulatory risk and enhance compliance while lowering costs.

      The High Costs of Data Integrity Issues for Banks

      Prestigious banks with strong IT teams are unable to trust their data. Errors, even if its occasional, in their decisions and reports are extremely costly financially and to their reputation.

      • TD Bank was fined $6.7 million by Canada’s anti-money laundering (AML) agency for failing to submit suspicious transaction reports and properly assess money laundering risks.
      • Wells Fargo faced enforcement action from the OCC for deficiencies in its anti-money laundering controls, requiring the bank to enhance its compliance programs.
      • Citigroup was fined $136 million by U.S. regulators for insufficient progress in addressing longstanding data management issues identified in 2020.

      Common Causes of Data Quality and Compliance Issues in Banking

      Despite sensible controls why do so many errors get through? The primary reasons for these data integrity challenges include:

      1. Non-scalable Data Control Processes: Traditional data control processes often lack the scalability needed to handle large volumes of data efficiently. Legacy tools like Informatica are extremely laborious and not designed for users to set up and validate 1,000’s of tables. They take man-years to do it not man-days.
      2. Unrealistic Expectations of Subject Matter Experts (SMEs): SMEs are typically responsible for writing data quality rules. However, they will not always foresee all potential issues, leading to gaps in data quality and integrity.
      3. Inability to Reconcile Data Across Platforms: As data moves from one platform to another, inconsistencies invariably arise, making it difficult to maintain data integrity.
      4. Resistance to Adopting Modern Solutions: There is often resistance to adopting machine learning- based solutions, which can automate and enhance data quality processes.
      5. Detection of Broken Data Pipelines: Identifying and addressing broken data pipelines is crucial, yet many organizations struggle with this, leading to data integrity issues.

      Fingerprinting: A Scalable Approach to Data Monitoring for Banks

      To address these issues in a scalable way banks must adopt the fingerprinting approach to monitoring data trust. It is powerful as it tracks all patterns, relationships and trends in the data. It monitors both important attributes and the seemingly unimportant ones. It is the equivalent of a seatbelt. Would you decide that certain roads are safe, and not put a seatbelt on your child? Even though you may be okay most of the time, it’s unsafe and unacceptable. The seatbelt is there to protect you from theunexpected. The best practice is to always wear the seatbelt because of the unknown-unknown risks. Banks should install automated, autonomous data trust monitoring solutions.

      DataBuck: AI Assistant for Autonomously Monitoring Data Trustability

      DataBuck offers several key features that significantly enhance data integrity and compliance efforts:

      1. Automated Rule Recommendations: Powered by AI/ML, DataBuck auto-discovers and recommends essential and advanced data quality rules for each dataset. These baseline set of rules can be complemented with additional custom rules as needed, ensuring reliability and accuracy.
      2. Continuous Trust Monitoring: The validation rules are auto coded to an executable form. DataBuck then continuously monitors data stores and pipelines. It creates circuit breakers to stop data errors from cascading to downstream applications.
      3. Secure Architecture: DataBuck moves the rules to where the data is and, not move the data itself. All data, results and computations are within the user’s firewalls. Data never leaves the company’s control. This ensures the highest levels of data security.
      4. Scalability: DataBuck autonomously validates 1,000’s of datasets with just 3 clicks, reducing data maintenance-work and costs.

      By adopting solutions like DataBuck, banks can overcome data integrity challenges, ensuring better compliance and reducing the risk of regulatory fines, while keeping the TCO at 1/10th of the traditional approach.

      Elevate Your Organization’s Data Quality With DataBuck by FirstEigen

      DataBuck enables autonomous data quality validation, catching 100% of systems risks and minimizing the need for manual intervention. With 1000s of validation checks powered by AI/ML, DataBuck allows businesses to validate entire databases and schemas in minutes rather than hours or days.

      To learn more about DataBuck and schedule a demo, contact FirstEigen today.

      Check out these articles on Data Trustability, Observability & Data Quality Management-

      FAQs

      What are data integrity issues in banking?

      Data integrity issues in banking refer to inaccuracies, inconsistencies, or errors in data that can affect decision-making, regulatory compliance, and overall operational efficiency. These issues can arise from various sources, including manual data entry, system integration challenges, and inadequate data control processes.

      How do data integrity issues impact compliance for banks?

      Data integrity issues can lead to significant compliance challenges for banks, resulting in regulatory fines, reputational damage, and operational inefficiencies. Inaccurate data may hinder banks' ability to meet regulatory requirements, such as anti-money laundering controls and reporting obligations.

      What are the common causes of data integrity issues in banking?

      Common causes include non-scalable data control processes, unrealistic expectations from subject matter experts (SMEs), difficulty reconciling data across multiple platforms, resistance to adopting modern data solutions, and challenges in detecting broken data pipelines.

      How can banks improve their data integrity and compliance efforts?

      Banks can enhance their data integrity and compliance by adopting modern, scalable solutions like DataBuck. Implementing continuous monitoring, automated rule recommendations, and a fingerprinting approach to track data patterns can significantly improve data quality and compliance efforts.

      What role does DataBuck play in addressing data integrity challenges?

      DataBuck is an AI-powered solution that autonomously validates data, monitors data quality, and provides automated recommendations for data quality rules. It enhances data integrity by continuously tracking data patterns and ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements.

      What are the benefits of using automated data validation solutions like DataBuck?

      Benefits include reduced manual intervention, increased efficiency, scalability to handle thousands of datasets with minimal effort, enhanced data security, and lower operational costs associated with data quality management.

      How can banks implement a fingerprinting approach to monitor data integrity?

       Implementing a fingerprinting approach involves continuously monitoring data patterns, relationships, and trends across all data sources. By using AI-driven tools like DataBuck, banks can automate this monitoring process, allowing for timely detection of anomalies and ensuring consistent data quality.

      Why is it important for banks to invest in data quality solutions?

      Investing in data quality solutions is crucial for banks to mitigate regulatory risks, enhance operational efficiency, maintain customer trust, and ultimately safeguard their reputation in a highly regulated industry. Ensuring accurate and reliable data is fundamental for informed decision-making and compliance adherence.

      Discover How Fortune 500 Companies Use DataBuck to Cut Data Validation Costs by 50%

      Recent Posts

      Data Quality with DataBuck
      Seamless Teradata to Databricks Migration: How to Tackle Challenges and Ensure Data Quality With DataBuck
      Data migration is one of those projects that often sounds straightforward—until you dive in and start uncovering ...
      Data Trustability Shapes Acquisition Outcomes
      How Data Trustability Shapes Acquisition Outcomes: The Veradigm Deal
      In recent reports, McKesson (NYSE: MCK) and Oracle (NYSE: ORCL) have emerged as key players in the ...
      Challenges With Data Observability
      Challenges With Data Observability Platforms and How to Overcome Them
      Core Differences Between Data Observability Platforms and DataBuck Many organizations that initially embraced data observability platforms are ...

      Get Started!